# ViSTa QC
Written by Dr. Hunter Moss
It is vital to inspect the output image called vista.nii for artifacts or other anomalies. To do this, examples of good and bad outputs are provided below. Empirically, it is found that windowing the ViSTa apparent myelin water fraction (aMWF) output between 0 and either 0.15 or 0.2
typically provides good contrast to check for artifacts. Additionally, the aMWF from ViSTa is really only valid in white matter, where typical values range between 0.1 and 0.2
Below is an ideal example of a raw ViSTa image, the corresponding reference image, and the aMWF map from a 33-year-old volunteer typically provides good contrast to check for artifacts. Additionally, the aMWF from ViSTa is really only valid in white matter, where typical values range between 0.1 and 0.2
Below is an ideal example of a raw ViSTa image, the corresponding reference image, and the aMWF map from a 33-year-old volunteer:
Due to motion or other factors, various image distortions and artifacts can arise in the processed aMWF map. Some examples are provided below (note, these are middle to older age subjects):
---
# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.
Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:
```
GET https://bridge-lab.gitbook.io/docs/imaging/image-analysis/general-concepts/image-qc/raw-data-qc/vista-qc.md?ask=
```
The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.
Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.